[ Back
Model Charge Transfer Systems Such as Solvated Metal Ions
The bulk of our work on electron transfer has focused on what is perhaps the simplest possible charge transfer reaction:  the transfer of an electron from a single atomic ion to a cavity in the solvent.  Our favorite system is the sodium anion (no, that's not a typo; we're really talking about negatively charged sodium here!).  Because the Na¯ system has only electronic degrees of freedom, any dynamics we see in the spectroscopy of this system must be the result of solvent motions; after all, nothing else but the solvent can move!  This allows us direct spectroscopic access to the effects of solvent motions on the reactant's electronic structure without interference from vibrations, rotations or other internal degrees of freedom.   We have fully characterized the spectroscopy of the Na¯/THF system, which now represents the only electron transfer reaction for which the spectrum of the reactant, its excited state, and both products are fully known and can be monitored independently as the reaction progresses.  What we found is that  photoexcitation of the sodium anion creates a localized excited state which is bound by the polarization of the solvent surrounding the anion.  As the solvent rearranges in response to this excitation, the electron is ejected from the sodium nucleus into a nearby solvent cavity.  In THF, the electron transfer takes ~700 fs, a time scale that suggests that solvent translational motions are responsible for the charge transfer dynamics; this result is consistent with computer simulations also being performed by our group.  By comparing the behavior of the solvated electrons produced via charge transfer to those created by direct ionization of the solvent, we have inferred many of the molecular details of electron transfer reactions, including:  the distance electrons are ejected following excitation, the stability of the resulting atom:electron contact pairs, and the fact that back electron transfer occurs slowly because it is in the Marcus inverted regime.  Our basic picture summarizing the photochemistry of the sodium anion is shown at left:  the initial absorption of light takes the extra 3s electron on the Na¯ and promotes it to a p-like excited state bound by the surrounding solvent.  As the first-shell molecules translate in response to this excitation, they "squeeze" some of the electron density and force the electron off the Na atom.  For low energy excitation (red-dashed wavefunction), the spatial extent of the wavefunction is small and the electron is ejected adjacent to the Na atom.  Since the ejected electron's wavefunction can still overlap with the Na nucleus, recombination occurs quickly, in under 2 picoseconds.  For higher energy excitation (blue-dashed wavefunction), however, the wavefunction has a much greater curvature, including significant probability density beyond the first solvent shell.  Thus, when the electron is subsequently ejected, there is a large probability that it ends up one solvent shell away from the Na atom.  This "solvent-separated" contact pair is a relatively stable entity:  the electron and Na atom cannot simply diffuse apart because it would cost a great deal of free energy to build entirely new solvent shells around each species.  It is also difficult for the electron to go back onto the Na atom for the same reason:  it costs energy to disrupt the solvent structure around the separated pair.  For THF at room temperature, a fluctuation that disrupts the local structure occurs on average once every few hundred picoseconds, leading to very slow recombination of the electron with its geminate Na atom partner.  The same solvent motions are responsible for the electron ejection process no matter what the excitation energy, so the 700 fs time scale for charge ejection is independent of excitation wavelength.  This picture is consistent with 3-pulse experiments in which we control the distance between the electron and the sodium atom by directly exciting the electron at different times after it has been ejected.  When electrons in immediate contact pairs are excited within the first 1.5 ps after ejection, the delocalization of the electronic wavefunction upon excitation produces an increased probability of finding the electron far from its Na atom partner, leading to a decrease in amount of back electron transfer  (recombination).  When the electrons in solvent separated contact pairs that exist at longer times (> 4 ps) after ejection are excited, however, the delocalization of the electronic wavefunction increases the probability of finding the electron in the same solvent cavity as the Na atom, enhancing the amount of recombination.  Finally, we have completed a study of the electron photodetachment process of Na¯ in a variety of different solvents, and we have been able to extract the position of the "conduction band" out from under the Na¯ absorption spectrum.  See, e.g.,

I. B. Martini and B. J. Schwartz, "Elucidating the Initial Dynamics of Electron Photodetachment from Atoms in Liquids Using Variably-Time-Delayed Resonant Multiphoton Ionization," J. Chem. Phys. 121(1), 374-9 (2004).

E. R. Barthel and B. J. Schwartz, "Mapping the Conduction Band Under CTTS Transitions:  The Photodetachment Quantum Yield of Sodide (Na¯) in Tetrahydrofuran," Chem. Phys. Lett. 375(3-4), 435-43 (2003).

E. R. Barthel, I. B. Martini, E. Keszei and B. J. Schwartz, "Solvent Effects on the Ultrafast Dynamics and Spectroscopy of the Charge-Transfer-to-Solvent (CTTS) Reaction of Sodide," J. Chem. Phys. 118(13), 5916-31 (2003).

I. B. Martini, E. R. Barthel and B. J. Schwartz, "Manipulating the Production and Recombination of Electrons During Electron Transfer:  Femtosecond Control of the Charge-Transfer-to-Solvent (CTTS) Dynamics of the Sodium Anion," J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124(25), 7622-34 (2002).

I. B. Martini and B. J. Schwartz, "On the Insensitivity of the Non-Adiabatic Relaxation of Solvated Electrons to the Details of their Local Solvent Environment," Chem. Phys. Lett. 360(1-2), 22-30 (2002).

I. B. Martini, E. R. Barthel and B. J. Schwartz, "Optical Control of Electrons During Electron Transfer," Science 293, 462-5 (2001).

E. R. Barthel, I. B. Martini and B. J. Schwartz, "How Does the Solvent Control Electron Transfer?  Experimental and Theoretical Studies of the Simplest Charge Transfer Reaction," FEATURE ARTICLE, J. Phys. Chem. B 105(49), 12230-41 (2001).

I. B. Martini, E. R. Barthel and B. J. Schwartz, "Mechanisms of the Ultrafast Production and Recombination of Solvated Electrons in Weakly-Polar Fluids: Comparison of Multiphoton Ionization and Detachment via the Charge-Transfer-to-Solvent Transition of Na¯ in THF," J. Chem. Phys. 113(24), 11245-57 (2000).

E. R. Barthel, I. Martini and B. J. Schwartz, "Direct Observation of Charge-Transfer-to-Solvent (CTTS) Transitions: Ultrafast Dynamics of the Photoexcited Alkali Metal Anion Sodide (Na¯)," J. Chem. Phys. 112(21), 9433-44 (2000).
 

For others' perspective on our work in this area, follow some of the links on the Schwartz Group Press page.
 

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under CAREER award CHE-9733218
 




[ Back]